Speaking In Tongues

Here’s a list of the different types of tongues mentioned in the New Testament, along with scriptural references:

1. Human Languages (Known Languages) – Acts 2:4-11

Description: This refers to speaking in a real, earthly language that the speaker has not learned but that others can understand.
Reference:
"And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. … And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?" (Acts 2:4, 8)

---

2. The Gift of Speaking in Tongues (A Supernatural Gift for Edification) – 1 Corinthians 12:10, 12:28-30

Description: A gift of the Holy Spirit enabling a believer to speak in tongues as a sign or for the edification of the church when interpreted.
Reference:
"To another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues." (1 Corinthians 12:10)
"Are all apostles? Are all prophets? … Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret?" (1 Corinthians 12:29-30)

---

3. Speaking Mysteries unto God (A Private Prayer Language) – 1 Corinthians 14:2

Description: This type of tongues is for personal edification, as the speaker communicates with God in a language that no man understands.
Reference:
"For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries." (1 Corinthians 14:2)

---

4. Groanings in the Spirit (Inexpressible Prayer by the Holy Spirit) – Romans 8:26

Description: This is a deep, wordless prayer where the Holy Spirit intercedes through groanings that cannot be expressed in human language.
Reference:
"Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered." (Romans 8:26)

---

Summary:

• Human Tongues (Known Languages) – Acts 2:4-11
• The Gift of Speaking in Tongues (for the Church) – 1 Corinthians 12:10, 28-30
• Speaking Mysteries unto God (Prayer Language) – 1 Corinthians 14:2
• Groanings in the Spirit (Intercession by the Holy Spirit) – Romans 8:26

Each of these forms of tongues serves a different purpose—whether for evangelism, edification, personal communion with God, or intercession.

Facts about Westcott and Hort - NIV

Facts about Westcott and Hort:

Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) were the two English "scholars" who produced the corrupt Greek text of the modern versions. Their dominating influence on the revision committee of 1871-1881 accounts for most of the corruption that we have today in modern translations. The Bible believer should keep several points in mind when discussing these two men. The following information are these: 

1. Together, the Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott and the Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort run over 1,800 pages. A personal salvation testimony is not given once for either man, and the name "Jesus" is found only nine times!

2. Westcott was a firm believer in Mary worship, and Hort claimed that Mary worship had a lot in common with Jesus worship.

3. Hort believed in keeping Roman Catholic sacraments.

4. Hort believed in baptismal regeneration as taught in the Catholic church.

5. Hort rejected the infallibility of Scripture.

6. Hort took great interest in the works of Charles Darwin, while both he and Westcott rejected the literal account of Creation.

7. Westcott did not believe in the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, the Millennium, or a literal Heaven.

8. Both men rejected the doctrine of a literal Hell, and they supported prayers for the dead in purgatory.

9. Hort refused to believe in the Holy Trinity.

10. Hort refused to believe in angels.

11. Westcott confessed that he was a communist by nature.

12. Hort confessed that he hated democracy in all it's forms.

13. Westcott also did his share of beer drinking. In fact, only twelve years after the Revised Version was published, Westcott was a spokesman for a brewery.

14. While working on their Greek text (1851-1871), and while working on the Revision Committee for the Revised Version (1871-1881), Westcott and Hort were also keeping company with "seducing spirits and doctrines of devils" (1 Timothy 4:1). Both men took great interest in occult practices and clubs. They started the Hermes Club in 1845, the Ghostly Guild in 1851, and Hort joined a secret club called The Apostles in the same year. They also started the Eranus Club in 1872. These were spiritualists groups which believed in such unscriptural practices as communicating with the dead (necromancy).

15. The Westcott and Hort Greek text was SECRETLY given to the Revision Committee.

16. The members of the Revision Committee of 1881 were sworn to a pledge of secrecy in regard to the new Greek text being used, and they met in silence for ten years.

17. The corrupt Greek text of Westcott and Hort was not released to the public until just five days before the debut of the Revised Version. This prevented Bible-believing scholars like Dean Burgon from reviewing it and exposing it for the piece of trash that it was.

Does this sound like an HONEST work of God or a DISHONEST work of the Devil?

NIV FALSE BIBLE VERSION

Many King James Only (KJV-Only) advocates believe that the New International Version (NIV) and other modern Bible translations are corrupt because they rely on different manuscript sources, primarily the Alexandrian texts. These arguments come from scholars and preachers who hold to the Textus Receptus (Received Text) and believe the King James Version (KJV) is the only true and preserved Word of God. Below is a summary of their main objections to the NIV and the Alexandrian texts.

Reasons Why KJV-Only Advocates Reject the NIV

1. Missing and Altered Verses

KJV-Only scholars argue that the NIV omits or changes key verses that support core Christian doctrines. Some examples include:

Matthew 17:21 – ("Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.") – Missing in the NIV.

Mark 16:9-20 – The longer ending of Mark is either omitted or footnoted in modern translations.

Acts 8:37 – A verse affirming belief in Christ before baptism is omitted.

1 John 5:7 – The Johannine Comma, supporting the Trinity, is removed or footnoted.

2. Use of Alexandrian Manuscripts

The NIV relies on older manuscripts from Alexandria, Egypt (Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus), while the KJV is based on the Textus Receptus.

KJV-Only scholars argue that the Alexandrian texts were corrupted by Gnostic influences or deliberate alterations by early scribes.

3. Changes in Christology (Diminishing Jesus’ Divinity)

Critics claim the NIV subtly weakens the doctrine of Christ’s deity. For example:

1 Timothy 3:16

KJV: "God was manifest in the flesh…"

NIV: "He appeared in the flesh…" (Removes "God")

Philippians 2:6

KJV: "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God…"

NIV: "Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage…" (Different meaning)

4. Westcott and Hort Connection

The scholars who influenced modern critical Greek texts (Westcott & Hort) are accused of having theological liberalism and occult interests.

KJV-Only teachers claim their Greek text was biased toward Roman Catholic and rationalist influences.

5. Paraphrased or Dynamic Equivalence Translation

The NIV uses a more thought-for-thought translation method, while the KJV is word-for-word.

This results in theological shifts that KJV-Only advocates believe distort God’s message.

6. Ecumenical and Liberal Bias

Some KJV defenders believe modern translations, including the NIV, were influenced by ecumenism, diluting biblical truth.

The NIV’s translation committee included scholars with theological liberalism, which raises suspicion among KJV supporters

Why the Alexandrian Texts Are Considered Corrupt

1. Origin in Egypt

Egypt is often associated with corruption in the Bible (e.g., Deuteronomy 17:16, Revelation 11:8).

KJV-Only advocates argue that God would not preserve His pure Word in a place known for heresies.

2. Missing Passages

The Alexandrian manuscripts often lack entire sections of Scripture (e.g., John 7:53-8:11, Mark 16:9-20), which raises suspicion of tampering.

3. Influence of Gnostic Thought

Some scholars believe early Alexandrian scribes were influenced by Gnosticism, a heretical belief system that distorts Christian doctrine.

4. Contradictions Among the Manuscripts

The Alexandrian texts (Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus) often disagree with each other, suggesting they are not reliable.

References from KJV-Only Scholars

1. Dr. David Otis Fuller – Which Bible? (Argues for the superiority of the Textus Receptus and exposes problems with modern translations.)

2. Dr. Peter Ruckman – The Christian’s Handbook of Manuscript Evidence (Strongly argues against the NIV and modern textual criticism.)

3. Gail Riplinger – New Age Bible Versions (Claims the NIV and other versions are influenced by New Age doctrines.)

4. Dr. Edward F. Hills – The King James Version Defended (Argues that the KJV is the providentially preserved Word of God.)

5. Dean John William Burgon – The Revision Revised (Criticized Westcott & Hort’s Greek text, defending the Traditional Text.)

Conclusion

KJV-Only scholars reject the NIV because they believe it is based on corrupt Alexandrian manuscripts, removes key doctrines, and was influenced by liberal theology. They argue that the KJV, based on the Textus Receptus and the Masoretic Text, is the true, preserved Word of God.

Here is a list of altered and missing verses in the NIV compared to the King James Version (KJV), along with explanations of why KJV-Only advocates believe these changes are erroneous and dangerous to Christian doctrine.

Missing Verses in the NIV

The following verses are completely removed from the NIV. In many cases, they are footnoted but not included in the main text.

These omissions are troubling to KJV-Only believers because they remove key doctrinal statements about salvation, fasting, spiritual warfare, and the reality of hell.

Altered Verses in the NIV (Doctrinal Changes)

In many cases, the NIV changes words or phrases, subtly affecting doctrine. Below are some examples of serious alterations.

1. 1 Timothy 3:16 – The Deity of Christ

KJV: "God was manifest in the flesh…"

NIV: "He appeared in the flesh…"

Issue: The NIV removes "God" and replaces it with "He," making the verse ambiguous. The KJV affirms that Jesus is God, while the NIV weakens this doctrine.

2. Colossians 1:14 – The Blood of Christ

KJV: "In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins."

NIV: "In whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins."

Issue: The NIV removes "through his blood," downplaying the importance of Christ’s blood for redemption (Hebrews 9:22).

3. Isaiah 14:12 – Lucifer Becomes "Morning Star"

KJV: "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!"

NIV: "How you have fallen from heaven, morning star, son of the dawn!"

Issue: "Morning Star" is a title given to Jesus in Revelation 22:16. The NIV confuses Lucifer (Satan) with Christ, creating a theological problem.

4. Luke 4:4 – The Word of God Omitted

KJV: "Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God."

NIV: "Man shall not live on bread alone."

Issue: The NIV removes "but by every word of God," weakening the doctrine of Scriptural authority.

5. 1 John 5:7 – The Trinity Weakened

KJV: "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."

NIV: "For there are three that testify."

Issue: The NIV removes a clear statement of the Trinity, weakening the biblical defense of this doctrine.

6. Philippians 2:6 – Christ’s Equality with God Changed

KJV: "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God."

NIV: "Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage."

Issue: The NIV implies that Jesus wasn’t equal with God, contradicting the doctrine of Christ’s divinity.

7. Micah 5:2 – Christ’s Eternality Altered

KJV: "Whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting."

NIV: "Whose origins are from of old, from ancient times."

Issue: The KJV affirms that Jesus is eternal, while the NIV makes it sound like He had an origin.

8. Mark 1:2 – Prophecy Misattributed

KJV: "As it is written in the prophets, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face…"

NIV: "As it is written in Isaiah the prophet…"

Issue: The prophecy quoted is actually from Malachi 3:1 and Isaiah 40:3. The NIV incorrectly attributes it only to Isaiah, creating an error.

9. Daniel 3:25 – The Fourth Man in the Fire Changed

KJV: "The fourth is like the Son of God."

NIV: "The fourth looks like a son of the gods."

Issue: The KJV points to Jesus Christ appearing in the fire, while the NIV makes it sound like a pagan deity.

10. Acts 2:30 – Christ's Resurrection Prophecy Weakened

KJV: "…according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne."

NIV: "…he would place one of his descendants on his throne."

Issue: The KJV directly states that Christ will sit on David’s throne, while the NIV weakens the prophecy by making it generic.

Conclusion: Why These Changes Are Problematic

1. Weakened Christology – Many NIV changes diminish Jesus’ deity, eternal existence, and equality with God.

2. Removal of Key Doctrines – The blood of Christ, fasting, the Trinity, and the necessity of God’s Word are all downplayed or removed.

3. Confusion in Prophecy – The NIV misattributes prophecies or alters meanings, leading to theological errors.

4. Corrupt Manuscript Sources – The NIV is based on Alexandrian manuscripts, which omit or modify verses, whereas the KJV is based on the Textus Receptus, which KJV-Only advocates believe is the preserved Word of God.

1 Corinthians 6:9 Effeminate

The NIV is a blasphemous trash doctrine, that should not be used by anyone! 

The effeminate are deceived and will not inherit the kingdom of God 1 Cor 6:9. This is blasphemous and antithetical.

You should be presenting yourself as a man created in the image of God.

People who use the (NIV) Bible (per)version think that it doesn’t say that. What version do you use?

"Be not deceived" (misled) .... In other words if you think the following list is not sin, then you are deceived...

"effeminate" effeminate perverts, homoerotic partners, 

Strongs concordance: Strong's Number - G3120

Greek: μαλακός

Transliteration: malakos

Pronunciation: mal-ak-os'

Definition: Of uncertain affinity;

soft that is fine (clothing); figuratively a catamite: - effeminate soft.

KJV Usage: soft (3x), effeminate (1x).

Occurs: 4

In verses: 3

KJV is the true version of the Bible.

Niv is a false translation, based on the textual criticism of "Westcott and Hort," two prominent 19th-century scholars whose Greek text was used as a foundation for the NIV.

These scholars favored a "Alexandrian" text type, which often differed from the "Byzantine" text traditionally used in many translations. This Alexandrian text sometimes had variations in wording compared to the Byzantine, leading to different interpretations in certain passages when translated into English.

The NIV translates malakoi as “male prostitutes.” The male prostitute was “soft” because he took the passive role in sexual relations with other men. Paul made up the word arsenokoitai. It was never used before Paul in any writing of the ancient world.

St Paul used this word "soft" to describe the effeminine prostitutes. He used the word effeminate to describe men who appeared to be women. The fact that they were prostitutes is a reference to them having homosexual relations with men who were not effeminine, but homosexual. The verse clearly states that it is quote the effeminate that will not inherit the kingdom of God. Irregardless of them being prostitutes. It is the blasphemy that is an expression antithetical to their sex which God created male and female. You are the express image of God and as such should conduct yourself accordance with this expression, not expressing yourself in such a testimony that is diametrically opposed to what is natural. Be true too yourself or to thine own self be true. 

If you thoroughly compare the NIV and the King James version you will soon discover from its historical documentation and translation that both are erroneous and filled with errors. 

Most translations translate the word effeminate, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that if a man is soft then he is effeminate. You should also consider the fact that if you represent yourself as the opposite sex and your expression you are more than likely attracting same sex partners. I would question whether or not you are homosexual or not. If so this is another issue that this very same verse brings up. 

Here is a video on YouTube explaining some of the errors of the NIV translation. 

https://youtu.be/7_sjTF1APAw?si=sPfJ5RAIZPqpDiBV

The same publishing company Zondervan which produces the NIV Bible also publishes the Satanic Bible and The Joy of Gay Sex.

Don't be a Cuck Pastor for the Government.

Christian churches in Canada must take steps to ensure that the government never again oversteps its authority over them.

No more church lockdowns.

No more arrests of pastors for keeping their churches open.

No more allowing the government to dictate when and how believers can assemble.

Romans 13 makes it clear that governing authorities exist to serve God’s purposes, not to replace Him. The government is meant to be a servant of the people, not their master. No earthly authority has the right to usurp God’s authority over His Church. Any government or institution that claims such power is acting outside its rightful role and should not be submitted to by the Church (the ecclesia). Christians are called to obey only those authorities that are truly ordained by God and aligned with His will and purpose for the Church.

Follow The Money - Ukraine War Profiteering

Follow the money...

#Warprofiteering 

"The Ukraine conflict isn’t a three-year war—it’s been in the making for decades through deception, corruption, and reckless U.S. power plays"

Key Moments They Don’t Want You to Remember:

🔹 1990 – The U.S. promised Russia NATO wouldn’t expand “one inch eastward.” That was a lie.

🔹 2002 – The U.S. unilaterally withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, destabilizing nuclear deterrence.

🔹 2004 – NATO added seven more countries, pushing right up to Russia’s borders.

🔹 2008 – Bush Jr. pushed to bring Ukraine and Georgia into NATO, crossing another red line.

🔹 2014 (February) – The CIA backed a coup in Ukraine, overthrowing its neutral leader. War followed.

🔹 2014 (March) – Crimea voted 97% to rejoin Russia in a referendum. The West called it “illegitimate,” ignoring the region’s long history with Russia. Moscow took Crimea back without firing a shot.

🔹 2022 (February) – Kamala Harris publicly invited Ukraine to join NATO, daring Russia to respond.

🔹 2022 (April) – UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson sabotaged peace talks in Kyiv, telling Zelensky to tear up the deal and keep fighting for “Western hegemony.”

🔹 2022-2024 – EU leaders blindly followed Washington’s war agenda, pumping billions into Ukraine, cutting off Russian energy, and crippling their own economies—all while their defense industries raked in profits.

🔹 February 12, 2025 – Trump and Putin actually talked—for the first time in years. Days later, the U.S. finally admitted Ukraine will NEVER join NATO.

🔹 2025 – Now that the U.S. is shifting under Trump, European leaders are in a panic. They backed a war they can’t win, and Washington is leaving them holding the bag.

Zelensky & His Backers

A comedian-turned-president, Zelensky was propped up by oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky—a corrupt banker so dirty even the U.S. sanctioned him.

Kolomoisky funded Zelensky’s rise from TV star to president and has deep ties to Western elites, bankers, and war profiteers who always cash in on conflict.

Meet the beggar boy

Meanwhile, Zelensky became America’s khaki-clad poster boy, begging for billions while:

🔹 Dissidents were jailed.

🔹 Men were dragged from their homes to fight.

🔹 Ukraine’s elites got filthy rich off the war.

Ukrainian Nazis

Now the Script is Falling Apart

So after three years of war, a million dead, and billions flushed down the drain… for what?

The Truth

This was never about “protecting Ukraine.” It was a reckless U.S. project to expand NATO, box in Russia, and funnel cash to defense contractors.

The Winners?

🔹 U.S. war profiteers

🔹 Corrupt oligarchs

🔹 The elites who fund both sides of every war

The Losers?

🔹 Ukrainians

🔹 Russians

🔹 You—the taxpayer

Beacon of democracy?

They lied. People died.

Now that they’ve milked it dry, they’re trying to move on.

Don’t let them.