Mark Carney and the Threat to Free Speech in Canada

🇨🇦 Mark Carney and the Threat to Free Speech in Canada

Mark Carney's support for increased regulation and oversight of social media platforms like Facebook is viewed by many conservatives and free speech advocates as a critical threat to freedom of expression in Canada. Here's why:

1. Globalist Control Over Public Discourse

Mark Carney is closely aligned with international regulatory bodies and globalist institutions such as the World Economic Forum (WEF), which advocate for strict control of online "disinformation." While this is often framed as a way to protect the public from harmful content, it frequently leads to centralized control over acceptable speech. Dissenting or unpopular views—particularly those challenging elite narratives on climate change, immigration, gender ideology, or public health—are often the first to be silenced.

2. A Pattern of Technocratic Overreach

Carney's background as a central banker and climate finance advisor shows a clear preference for top-down governance, where unelected experts shape policy. Applying this approach to social media risks transforming platforms into sanitized echo chambers governed by bureaucratic regulators and corporate allies.

3. Chilling Effect on Political Speech

Political leaders who advocate "cracking down" on certain speech risk introducing subjective standards of what constitutes "hate speech," "disinformation," or "harmful" content. In practice, conservative viewpoints are disproportionately censored, shadow-banned, or removed, while progressive messaging remains untouched. Carney's regulatory stance signals a willingness to politicize censorship.

4. Undermining Canadian Charter Rights

Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects freedom of expression. Government-imposed or encouraged censorship—whether direct or indirect—undermines this right. Carney’s support for regulatory crackdowns aligns with controversial legislation like Bill C-11 and C-18, which critics say hand excessive power to unelected bureaucrats over what Canadians can see and say online.

5. Precedent for Authoritarianism

Once a government begins defining “acceptable speech,” the line continues to shift. Today it may be misinformation—tomorrow, criticism of government policy, religious beliefs, or traditional values. Carney’s push for censorship creates a dangerous precedent that threatens open democracy.

✨ Conclusion: A Threat to a Free Society

Carney’s stance on social media regulation is more than a policy difference—it represents a threat to democracy itself. A free society cannot thrive without free speech. His technocratic, globalist approach could silence legitimate voices under the guise of “safety” and “truth.”

🇬🇧 Controversies During Carney's Tenure in the UK

1. Accusations of Groupthink and Policy Missteps

As Governor of the Bank of England, Carney faced criticism for fostering a culture of "groupthink," leading to decisions that some believe hindered productivity and compromised the Bank's independence.  Economist Andrew Sentance highlighted concerns about the Bank becoming "timid" under Carney's leadership.

2. Handling of the Help to Buy Scheme

Carney's oversight of the UK's Help to Buy program, aimed at stimulating the housing market, was contentious.  He acknowledged the scheme's potential to inflate housing prices but lacked the authority to veto it, raising questions about his influence over policies that could destabilize the economy.

3. Brexit Predictions and Economic Forecasts

Carney's forecasts about the economic fallout from Brexit were met with skepticism.  His warnings of a potential recession post-Brexit were viewed by some as politically charged and ultimately did not materialize as predicted, leading to doubts about his impartiality and judgment.

🇨🇦 Concerns Regarding Carney's Policies in Canada

1. Environmental Initiatives and Economic Implications

Carney's advocacy for environmental policies, such as the carbon tax, faced backlash in Canada.  Despite intentions to reduce emissions, the tax was unpopular and eventually scrapped due to political pressure and public dissatisfaction.

2. Perceived Disconnect with Canadian Economic Realities

Critics argue that Carney's globalist perspective may not align with Canada's economic needs.  His emphasis on international agreements and environmental goals is seen by some as neglecting domestic issues like housing affordability and energy sector challenges.

🧭 Globalist Orientation and National Interests

Carney's extensive involvement in international financial institutions and climate-focused organizations has led to perceptions of him prioritizing global agendas over national interests.  His leadership roles in entities like the Bank of England and environmental finance groups suggest a commitment to globalist policies, which some fear may come at the expense of Canada's economic autonomy.

⚠️ Conclusion: Evaluating Carney's Impact on Canada's Economy

While Mark Carney brings a wealth of international experience, his track record raises questions about his suitability to address Canada's unique economic challenges.  Critics contend that his globalist approach may not adequately prioritize national interests, potentially posing risks to Canada's economic stability and sovereignty.

Mark Carney is a globalist. 

When I ask people or tell them anything about #globalism they look at me with their head turned sideways like they've never heard the term before. Most people don't even know what is going on in the world or have any glimpse of the broader picture and threat that globalism is to their national sovereignty and freedom.

Alex Jones defines globalism and the New World Order (#NWO) as part of a coordinated agenda by powerful bureaucratic elites to centralize global control, often through supranational institutions like the United Nations, World Economic Forum, or multinational corporations. His views combine political, economic, and conspiratorial elements. Here's a breakdown:

Alex Jones's Definition of Globalism:

Jones sees globalism as:

The elimination of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government.

Rule by unelected technocrats and corporate elites, not democratic institutions.

A system designed to undermine traditional values, borders, and individual freedoms.

A tool for population control, surveillance, and the erosion of constitutional rights.

He frequently ties globalism to efforts like:

The European Union (as a prototype of world government),

#Climatechangehoax policy (used to justify global control),

Central banks (as tools of economic manipulation)

Alex Jones's Definition of the New World Order (NWO):

The New World Order, according to Jones, is:

A long-standing plan by global elites to create a centralized authoritarian world government.

Involves control over every aspect of life—economic, political, religious, and technological

Orchestrated through false-flag events, economic crises, pandemics, and other engineered emergencies.

Promoted by secretive groups like the Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, and sometimes the WEF.

Key Themes in Jones's Narrative:

"#GreatReset" is often cited as a modern push toward the NWO.

Globalism vs. Nationalism: Jones positions himself as defending national sovereignty against global tyranny.

Technocratic Control: Use of AI, digital ID, and social credit systems as tools of oppression.

#Technocrats

Mark Carney & Free Speech

All in all, all you are is just another brick in the wall.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government implemented the Online News Act (Bill C-18) in June 2023. This legislation mandates that major digital platforms, such as Meta (which owns Facebook and Instagram) and Google, compensate Canadian news organizations when their content is shared on these platforms. The intent behind the law is to support Canada's struggling news industry by ensuring fair compensation for journalistic content .

In response, Meta began blocking all news content for Canadian users on Facebook and Instagram starting in August 2023, rather than complying with the payment requirements. This action led to a significant decline in traffic to Canadian news outlets, particularly affecting smaller and local publishers .

Critics, including Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre, have labeled the Online News Act as a form of censorship, arguing that it restricts Canadians' access to news on social media platforms . However, the Trudeau government maintains that the legislation is designed to promote fairness in the digital news marketplace and to support the sustainability of Canadian journalism. 

As of May 2025, Meta's news ban remains in effect, and the debate over the balance between platform regulation and freedom of information continues in Canada. 

      .

.

  .