Pre-adamic Civilization

Biblical Evidence for Pre-Adamic Civilizations: A Study Guide

This guide explores the possibility of pre-Adamic civilizations and Earth history before the creation of Adam and Eve, based on select passages from the Bible. While Scripture does not make direct claims about such civilizations, some verses hint at an earlier world, possible judgments, and the fall of angelic beings.

1. Job 38:4–7 — Angels Witness the Earth’s Foundation

> "Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? ... When the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy?"

The "sons of God" (bene Elohim), usually interpreted as angels, existed before Earth was completed.

Suggests that spiritual beings were present before Adam, possibly witnessing a prior world order.

2. Jeremiah 4:23–26 — A Desolate Earth with Destroyed Cities

> "I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light... and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD."

Mirrors Genesis 1:2 in Hebrew phrase tohu va-bohu (formless and void).

Mentions destroyed cities despite "no man" being present, implying a judgment before Adam.

3. Genesis 1:1–2 — The Gap Theory

> "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty..."

The "Gap Theory" posits a temporal gap between verses 1 and 2.

The Hebrew word for "was" (hayetah) can be translated "became."

Implies a possible previous Earth ruined by judgment before the six-day re-creation.

4. Isaiah 14:12–17 — The Fall of Lucifer

> "How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! ... You said, 'I will ascend into heaven... I will be like the Most High.'"

Describes Lucifer's rebellion and fall.

Could coincide with an earlier judgment that rendered Earth "formless and void."

5. Ezekiel 28:12–17 — The King of Tyre and Eden Imagery

> "You were in Eden, the garden of God... You were perfect in your ways... till iniquity was found in you."

Shifts from addressing a human king to describing a cherub in Eden.

Often interpreted as a depiction of Satan's fall.

Suggests spiritual history preceding Adam.

Conclusion: Hints, Not Dogma

These passages provide a theological basis for the idea of a pre-Adamic world or civilization.

They support the possibility of angelic activity and divine judgment on Earth prior to Adam.

Old Earth Creation models (like Dr. Hugh Ross's) incorporate these hints while remaining faithful to biblical inerrancy.

This study encourages open exploration of Scripture's depth and the possible history of the cosmos in light of God’s eternal plan.

For further study, consider cross-referencing these verses with historical theology, ancient Hebrew word studies, and Old Earth Creationist commentaries.

------------------------------------

Bible Study Lesson: Possible Pre-Adamic Civilizations in Scripture

I've added a structured Bible study lesson and a visual chart exploring possible pre-Adamic civilizations based on Scripture.

Objective: To explore biblical passages that suggest the possibility of pre-Adamic civilizations and how these ideas align with an Old Earth Creation model, such as that proposed by Dr. Hugh Ross.

I. Introduction to the Pre-Adamic Concept

The Bible does not explicitly mention civilizations before Adam and Eve, but several passages may hint at a created order before humanity’s appearance in Eden.

This view is compatible with Old Earth Creationism, which allows for an ancient Earth with events preceding the Genesis 1:2 re-creation of Earth.

II. Key Passages and Interpretations

1. Genesis 1:1–2

> "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep..."

Verse 1 may refer to the original creation.

Verse 2 describes the Earth in a chaotic, lifeless state—interpreted by some as the result of a judgment on a prior creation.

Hebrew word "tohu wa-bohu" (formless and void) used in other judgment contexts (see Jeremiah 4:23).

2. Jeremiah 4:23–26

> "I looked at the earth—it was formless and empty; and at the heavens, and their light was gone... all the cities were in ruins before the LORD, before his fierce anger."

Mirrors Genesis 1:2 language.

References to cities suggest a prior inhabited world.

Possibly a judgment on an earlier civilization distinct from Adam’s.

3. Job 38:4–7

> "Where were you when I laid the earth’s foundation?... while the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy?"

Angels existed before the Earth was fully formed.

Suggests activity and divine creation prior to Adamic humanity.

4. 2 Peter 3:5–6

> "...long ago by God's word the heavens existed and the earth was formed... By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed."

Some interpret this as referring to a world that predated Noah—potentially pre-Adamic.

May imply a prior creation that was judged.

5. Ezekiel 28:13–17 (King of Tyre / Satan typology)

> "You were in Eden, the garden of God... You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created till wickedness was found in you."

Many theologians see this as a double reference: both to the King of Tyre and to Satan.

Satan’s fall appears to precede Eden.

Possibly ties to a pre-Adamic time when Earth was a domain for angelic beings.

III. Old Earth Creation Context

Dr. Hugh Ross teaches that:

The universe is ~13.8 billion years old.

The Earth is ~4.5 billion years old.

Life arose in stages, with Adam and Eve being special creations relatively recently.

These passages support the idea of creation epochs or stages of divine activity before Eden.

IV. Visual Chart: Pre-Adamic Timeline Hypothesis

Stage Biblical Support Description

Initial Creation Genesis 1:1 God creates the heavens and the Earth

Destruction/Chaos Genesis 1:2, Jeremiah 4:23–26 Earth is "formless and void"; judged or ruined

Angelic Presence Job 38:4–7, Ezekiel 28:13–17 Angels present before Eden, possibly ruling

Re-creation Week Genesis 1:3–31 6 days of restoration; Adam and Eve created

Post-Fall History Genesis 3 onward Human history unfolds, judgment through Flood

V. Theological Reflection

Whether literal or symbolic, these passages give room to consider that God's creative work may involve more than one phase.

Supports the biblical idea that God has a redemptive plan extending across epochs.

Reinforces reverence for Scripture while harmonizing with scientific discoveries.

Conclusion:

While speculative, the concept of a pre-Adamic creation finds biblical hints that can support a robust theology of creation, judgment, and re-creation. This is consistent with Old Earth Creation models and enriches our understanding of God’s activity in the universe.

📽️

The world before Adam and Eve

Doctor Hugh Ross Old Earth and Ancient Civilizations

---

Is There Any Sign of Ancient Civilizations in Antarctica? A Biblical and Scientific Inquiry Through the Lens of Dr. Hugh Ross’s Old Earth Creation Model

It is my personal view that ancient civilizations may have existed in what is now Antarctica. While mainstream science strongly disputes this possibility, it is worth examining the arguments from both sides—particularly through the interpretive lens of Dr. Hugh Ross’s Old Earth Creation (OEC) model, which harmonizes the biblical creation account with established scientific findings.

The Conventional Scientific Position

Most modern scientists assert there is no credible evidence of ancient human civilizations in Antarctica. Their key points include:

1. Ice Coverage Timeline
   Antarctica has been encased in ice for approximately 34 million years, long before modern humans appeared (about 300,000 years ago). Given the continent's extreme cold and ice thickness, any past civilization would have been obliterated or buried beyond reach.

2. Geological and Satellite Research
   Extensive geological surveys, ice core sampling, and ground-penetrating radar have yielded no archaeological evidence of human settlement. Fossils found are of ancient flora and fauna from when the continent was temperate over 100 million years ago.

3. Rejection of Pseudoscience
   Theories involving hidden pyramids or lost cities in Antarctica—promoted in speculative media like Ancient Aliens—are generally dismissed by scholars as misinterpretations or fabrications.

An Old Earth Creationist Response: A Different Perspective

While young Earth creationists interpret Antarctica’s formation through a global flood model (Genesis 6–9), Dr. Hugh Ross and other Old Earth Creationists (OEC) accept the Earth’s great antiquity, affirming both biblical truth and modern science.

According to the OEC view:

• The Earth is 4.5 billion years old, and Antarctica’s current icy condition began about 34 million years ago, aligning with paleoclimate studies.
• Genesis 1:2 describes the early Earth as “formless and void,” suggesting a planet that was not initially habitable—a view compatible with an ancient, evolving Earth shaped over eons.
• The Hebrew word “yom” (day) in Genesis 1 is best understood contextually as long epochs (Psalm 90:4; 2 Peter 3:8), not literal 24-hour days. Dr. Ross argues that the biblical days of creation represent extended periods during which God prepared the Earth for life.

Theological Support for an Ancient Earth

1. Genesis 1 and the Order of Creation
   The biblical sequence of creation mirrors the scientific record: light, atmosphere, land, plants, sea life, birds, mammals, and finally humans. This harmony suggests the Bible anticipates scientific discovery, supporting a model where God progressively shaped life.

2. Psalm 19:1–4 & Romans 1:20
   Scripture affirms that God’s creation declares His glory and reveals His nature. OEC interprets scientific evidence—cosmology, geology, and biology—as part of God’s general revelation.

3. The Flood: Local or Global?
   Ross argues the Genesis Flood (Genesis 6–9) was universal in judgment but geographically limited, likely centered in Mesopotamia. The Hebrew term “kol erets” (“whole Earth”) is often used to refer to a region, not the entire globe (e.g., Genesis 41:57).

Examining Fossils and Geological Evidence

Contrary to young Earth views, OEC does not reject the vast age of Earth’s layers or fossil record. However, it agrees that some features suggest rapid burial events, possibly due to localized catastrophes.

• Fossils Found Across Strata
  While some fossils cross multiple sediment layers (polystrate fossils), OEC holds that localized, high-energy events—volcanic eruptions or floods—can explain these phenomena without requiring a global deluge.

• Soft Tissue in Dinosaur Fossils
  Reports of soft tissue in dinosaur bones (e.g., Dr. Mary Schweitzer’s findings) raise questions, but Ross suggests that rare conditions may preserve tissue for millions of years without overturning the entire geological timeline.

• Upright Fossil Trees (Polystrate Fossils)
  These can result from sudden, regional sedimentation—again, consistent with ancient Earth models that accept rapid, not necessarily global, geological processes.

A Biblical and Scientific Harmony

Dr. Ross’s Progressive Creation Model asserts that God’s creative work unfolded over long epochs, with divine intervention at key junctures. This view:

• Upholds biblical authority while affirming modern astronomy and geology.
• Accepts the Big Bang as evidence for “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1).
• Views nature as the “67th book of the Bible,” declaring God’s glory (Psalm 19:1).

Final Thoughts: Could Civilization Have Once Existed in Antarctica?

While there is currently no scientific evidence for human civilization beneath Antarctica’s ice, an Old Earth Creationist model remains open to the possibility of unknown pre-Adamic civilizations or advanced animal species inhabiting now-lost temperate zones. Genesis does not preclude such a history, and OEC encourages exploration without compromising Scripture.

Yes, there are indeed several passages—especially in Job, Jeremiah, and Genesis—that some scholars and theologians (including some Old Earth Creationists) interpret as hints of a pre-Adamic world. While the Bible doesn’t explicitly teach the existence of pre-Adamic civilizations, these verses suggest a possible history on Earth before Adam, particularly if one allows for long ages and a gap between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2 (often called the Gap Theory or Restoration View).

Here are key passages that support the idea of a world or judgment before Adam:

---

1. Job 38:4–7 — Angels Rejoiced Before Humanity Existed

“Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? ... When the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy?”

• Interpretation: The "sons of God" (bene Elohim) are typically interpreted as angels (see Job 1:6).
• These spiritual beings existed before Adam and even before Earth's foundation was completed.
• Some theologians propose that there may have been an earlier order of creation (possibly involving non-human intelligent life) that predated Adam.

---

2. Jeremiah 4:23–26 — A Desolate Earth Judged by God

“I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light.
I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly.
I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled.
I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD…”

• This passage echoes the language of Genesis 1:2 ("formless and void" = tohu va-bohu in Hebrew).
• Yet it also refers to cities being destroyed, which did not exist yet in Genesis 1:2.
• Some see this as a reference to a previous judgment on a world before Adam, possibly including a civilization wiped out before the re-creation in Genesis.

---

3. Genesis 1:1–2 — A Possible Gap

"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty..."

• The “Gap Theory” suggests that Genesis 1:1 describes an original creation, and 1:2 begins a reconstruction after some catastrophic judgment.
• The Hebrew word translated “was” in “the earth was formless and void” (hayetah) can also mean “became,” implying a transition from a previous state.
• This interpretation allows for long epochs, possible pre-Adamic events, and even the fall of Lucifer before Adam (see Isaiah 14, Ezekiel 28).

---

4. Isaiah 14:12–17 — The Fall of Lucifer

“How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!... For you have said in your heart: ‘I will ascend into heaven... I will be like the Most High.’ Yet you shall be brought down to Sheol...”

• Lucifer’s rebellion predates Adam, and his fall may have triggered judgment on Earth, causing the desolation described in Genesis 1:2 and Jeremiah 4.
• This supports the idea that Earth experienced spiritual and possibly physical upheaval before Adam was created.

---

5. Ezekiel 28:12–17 — The King of Tyre and Pre-Adamic Imagery

“You were in Eden, the garden of God... You were perfect in your ways from the day you were created, till iniquity was found in you.”

• This passage, while addressing the King of Tyre, quickly shifts to describing a cherubic being, often interpreted as Satan.
• The mention of Eden and a fall before Adam’s sin has led some to theorize about angelic governance of Earth in a pre-Adamic age.

---

Conclusion: Biblical Hints, Not Certainties

While the Bible does not explicitly affirm pre-Adamic civilizations, certain verses suggest:

• Earth may have had a history before Adam.
• A prior judgment may have occurred (possibly due to Satan’s fall).
• The desolation in Genesis 1:2 may reflect the aftermath of that judgment.
• The reordering of Earth during the six creation “days” could be God’s restoration.

This perspective aligns well with Dr. Hugh Ross’s Old Earth Creation model, which does not require young Earth timelines or global flood geology, and instead proposes long ages of preparation and divine intervention leading up to the special creation of humanity.

As Job 12:7–10 reminds us, “Ask the animals, and they will teach you... or speak to the earth, and it will teach you.” The Earth speaks volumes about its history, and Dr. Ross’s approach helps us listen—scientifically and biblically.

---

Mark Carney and the Threat to Free Speech in Canada

🇨🇦 Mark Carney and the Threat to Free Speech in Canada

Mark Carney's support for increased regulation and oversight of social media platforms like Facebook is viewed by many conservatives and free speech advocates as a critical threat to freedom of expression in Canada. Here's why:

1. Globalist Control Over Public Discourse

Mark Carney is closely aligned with international regulatory bodies and globalist institutions such as the World Economic Forum (WEF), which advocate for strict control of online "disinformation." While this is often framed as a way to protect the public from harmful content, it frequently leads to centralized control over acceptable speech. Dissenting or unpopular views—particularly those challenging elite narratives on climate change, immigration, gender ideology, or public health—are often the first to be silenced.

2. A Pattern of Technocratic Overreach

Carney's background as a central banker and climate finance advisor shows a clear preference for top-down governance, where unelected experts shape policy. Applying this approach to social media risks transforming platforms into sanitized echo chambers governed by bureaucratic regulators and corporate allies.

3. Chilling Effect on Political Speech

Political leaders who advocate "cracking down" on certain speech risk introducing subjective standards of what constitutes "hate speech," "disinformation," or "harmful" content. In practice, conservative viewpoints are disproportionately censored, shadow-banned, or removed, while progressive messaging remains untouched. Carney's regulatory stance signals a willingness to politicize censorship.

4. Undermining Canadian Charter Rights

Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects freedom of expression. Government-imposed or encouraged censorship—whether direct or indirect—undermines this right. Carney’s support for regulatory crackdowns aligns with controversial legislation like Bill C-11 and C-18, which critics say hand excessive power to unelected bureaucrats over what Canadians can see and say online.

5. Precedent for Authoritarianism

Once a government begins defining “acceptable speech,” the line continues to shift. Today it may be misinformation—tomorrow, criticism of government policy, religious beliefs, or traditional values. Carney’s push for censorship creates a dangerous precedent that threatens open democracy.

✨ Conclusion: A Threat to a Free Society

Carney’s stance on social media regulation is more than a policy difference—it represents a threat to democracy itself. A free society cannot thrive without free speech. His technocratic, globalist approach could silence legitimate voices under the guise of “safety” and “truth.”

🇬🇧 Controversies During Carney's Tenure in the UK

1. Accusations of Groupthink and Policy Missteps

As Governor of the Bank of England, Carney faced criticism for fostering a culture of "groupthink," leading to decisions that some believe hindered productivity and compromised the Bank's independence.  Economist Andrew Sentance highlighted concerns about the Bank becoming "timid" under Carney's leadership.

2. Handling of the Help to Buy Scheme

Carney's oversight of the UK's Help to Buy program, aimed at stimulating the housing market, was contentious.  He acknowledged the scheme's potential to inflate housing prices but lacked the authority to veto it, raising questions about his influence over policies that could destabilize the economy.

3. Brexit Predictions and Economic Forecasts

Carney's forecasts about the economic fallout from Brexit were met with skepticism.  His warnings of a potential recession post-Brexit were viewed by some as politically charged and ultimately did not materialize as predicted, leading to doubts about his impartiality and judgment.

🇨🇦 Concerns Regarding Carney's Policies in Canada

1. Environmental Initiatives and Economic Implications

Carney's advocacy for environmental policies, such as the carbon tax, faced backlash in Canada.  Despite intentions to reduce emissions, the tax was unpopular and eventually scrapped due to political pressure and public dissatisfaction.

2. Perceived Disconnect with Canadian Economic Realities

Critics argue that Carney's globalist perspective may not align with Canada's economic needs.  His emphasis on international agreements and environmental goals is seen by some as neglecting domestic issues like housing affordability and energy sector challenges.

🧭 Globalist Orientation and National Interests

Carney's extensive involvement in international financial institutions and climate-focused organizations has led to perceptions of him prioritizing global agendas over national interests.  His leadership roles in entities like the Bank of England and environmental finance groups suggest a commitment to globalist policies, which some fear may come at the expense of Canada's economic autonomy.

⚠️ Conclusion: Evaluating Carney's Impact on Canada's Economy

While Mark Carney brings a wealth of international experience, his track record raises questions about his suitability to address Canada's unique economic challenges.  Critics contend that his globalist approach may not adequately prioritize national interests, potentially posing risks to Canada's economic stability and sovereignty.

Mark Carney is a globalist. 

When I ask people or tell them anything about #globalism they look at me with their head turned sideways like they've never heard the term before. Most people don't even know what is going on in the world or have any glimpse of the broader picture and threat that globalism is to their national sovereignty and freedom.

Alex Jones defines globalism and the New World Order (#NWO) as part of a coordinated agenda by powerful bureaucratic elites to centralize global control, often through supranational institutions like the United Nations, World Economic Forum, or multinational corporations. His views combine political, economic, and conspiratorial elements. Here's a breakdown:

Alex Jones's Definition of Globalism:

Jones sees globalism as:

The elimination of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government.

Rule by unelected technocrats and corporate elites, not democratic institutions.

A system designed to undermine traditional values, borders, and individual freedoms.

A tool for population control, surveillance, and the erosion of constitutional rights.

He frequently ties globalism to efforts like:

The European Union (as a prototype of world government),

#Climatechangehoax policy (used to justify global control),

Central banks (as tools of economic manipulation)

Alex Jones's Definition of the New World Order (NWO):

The New World Order, according to Jones, is:

A long-standing plan by global elites to create a centralized authoritarian world government.

Involves control over every aspect of life—economic, political, religious, and technological

Orchestrated through false-flag events, economic crises, pandemics, and other engineered emergencies.

Promoted by secretive groups like the Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, and sometimes the WEF.

Key Themes in Jones's Narrative:

"#GreatReset" is often cited as a modern push toward the NWO.

Globalism vs. Nationalism: Jones positions himself as defending national sovereignty against global tyranny.

Technocratic Control: Use of AI, digital ID, and social credit systems as tools of oppression.

#Technocrats

Mark Carney & Free Speech

All in all, all you are is just another brick in the wall.

Metallica is Satanic

Metallica is Satanic.

These disciples of Satan hail him at every turn with every mocking lyric against Christianity.

Stop listening to this heavy metal rock group, because you are channeling demonic anti-Christian spirits into your life by doing so.

Listening to heavy metal music with dark, aggressive, or explicitly anti-spiritual themes can have a deeply negative influence on your emotional, mental, and even spiritual well-being. When a person immerses themselves in music that promotes despair, hatred, rebellion, or darkness, they can begin to internalize those messages, even subconsciously. Over time, this exposure may contribute to feelings of heaviness, emotional instability, anxiety, and confusion.

The atmosphere created by such music can open the door to a mindset of hopelessness and emotional oppression. It can make it harder to experience peace, joy, and clarity. Repeated exposure can create a sort of mental and emotional environment that invites negativity—drawing in people, behaviors, and attitudes that reinforce the same darkness being consumed.

This isn’t just about the music itself, but the overall lifestyle and mindset that can grow from aligning with such energies. It can act like a magnet for unhealthy habits, toxic relationships, and emotional burdens that become difficult to break free from. Over time, these influences can form strongholds in one’s life—patterns of thought and behavior that feel inescapable and feed into cycles of depression, isolation, or destructive choices.

By being mindful of what we consume, including the music we listen to, we protect our emotional and spiritual health. Choosing uplifting, positive, and life-affirming music can help cultivate a sense of peace, clarity, and strength—supporting personal growth and inner freedom.

Here is a Christian worldview analysis of Metallica's "Enter Sandman", exploring how the song may be perceived as Christian-phobic, blasphemous, or spiritually dark by those holding to biblical values.

---

Overview

"Enter Sandman" is framed as a heavy metal song that blends lullaby-style innocence with nightmare-inducing fear. At first glance, it may seem like a poetic take on childhood nightmares. But a deeper Christian analysis reveals troubling themes: distortion of sacred prayers, spiritual manipulation, and glorification of fear and darkness. These elements can be seen as mocking or perverting aspects of the Christian faith.

---

LYRICAL ANALYSIS FROM A CHRISTIAN WORLDVIEW

Verse 1

"Say your prayers, little one
Don't forget, my son
To include everyone
I tuck you in, warm within
Keep you free from sin
'Til the Sandman he comes"

Analysis:
These lines mimic the language of Christian parenting—saying prayers, protection from sin. However, the introduction of the Sandman as a guardian figure is the first subversion. In Christian teaching, only God can keep someone free from sin through Christ (Romans 6:23). Suggesting a mythical, shadowy figure takes over this role replaces God with a demonic substitute, which borders on idolatry and blasphemy.

---

Chorus

"Exit light
Enter night
Take my hand
We're off to never-never land"

Analysis:
This represents a spiritual inversion. “Exit light” and “enter night” symbolize a rejection of Christ, the Light of the World (John 8:12), and an embrace of darkness—often associated in Scripture with sin, death, and Satan (Ephesians 5:11). “Never-never land” might sound like fantasy, but here it’s portrayed as a place led by darkness and nightmares, not innocence.

---

Verse 2

"Something's wrong, shut the light
Heavy thoughts tonight
And they aren't of Snow White
Dreams of war, dreams of liars
Dreams of dragon's fire
And of things that will bite, yeah"

Analysis:
The child’s dreams are corrupted—“not of Snow White” but of war, lies, and hellish imagery (“dragon's fire,” symbolic of Satan in Revelation 12:9). This reflects the distortion of innocence, a consequence of exposure to evil. The idea that such thoughts are normal or inevitable opposes the biblical view of guarding the mind and heart (Philippians 4:8).

---

Bridge – Twisted Bedtime Prayer

"Now I lay me down to sleep
Pray the Lord my soul to keep
If I die before I wake
Pray the Lord my soul to take"

Analysis:
This is a real Christian children’s prayer, but in the song, it's embedded within a context of fear and nightmares, reducing it to a mockery. Rather than a sincere plea for God’s protection, it becomes a backdrop to horror, possibly suggesting that even prayer can’t stop the onslaught of darkness—undermining faith.

---

Whispered Line

*"Hush little baby, don’t say a word
And never mind that noise you heard
It’s just the beasts under your bed
In your closet

My Grace Is Sufficient

"My Grace Is Sufficient for You"

When God calls you, He equips you. Everything you need to fulfill your calling has already been placed inside you by the One who created you. You don’t have to see yourself as incapable or unqualified. Instead, see yourself as empowered and chosen by God.

1. God's grace is enough for your journey.

"But he said to me, 'My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.' Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ’s power may rest on me."

— 2 Corinthians 12:9

2. You are equipped for your calling.

"Now may the God of peace... equip you with everything good for doing his will, and may he work in us what is pleasing to him, through Jesus Christ."

— Hebrews 13:20–21

3. God doesn't make mistakes.

"For we are God’s masterpiece. He has created us anew in Christ Jesus, so we can do the good things he planned for us long ago."

— Ephesians 2:10 (NLT)

4. Many in Scripture felt unqualified, but God used them powerfully.

"But Moses said to God, 'Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh and bring the Israelites out of Egypt?' And God said, 'I will be with you.'"

— Exodus 3:11–12

"Then I said, 'Ah, Sovereign Lord! I do not know how to speak; I am too young.' But the Lord said to me, 'Do not say, "I am too young." You must go to everyone I send you to and say whatever I command you.'"

— Jeremiah 1:6–7

5. It is Christ in you who makes you qualified.

"I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me."

— Philippians 4:13

"Not that we are competent in ourselves to claim anything for ourselves, but our competence comes from God."

— 2 Corinthians 3:5

6. Remain faithful and steadfast in your calling.

"Therefore, my dear brothers and sisters, stand firm. Let nothing move you. Always give yourselves fully to the work of the Lord, because you know that your labor in the Lord is not in vain."

— 1 Corinthians 15:58

ENM POLY?!

ENM POLY?!

There's nothing ETHICAL about a NON MONOGAMOUS POLY MARRIAGE - it's called ADULTERY!

ENM (Ethical Non-Monogamy) and polyamory are modern terms often used to rebrand and justify relationships that fall outside the biblical standard of lifelong, exclusive marriage between one man and one woman. While they may be framed as consensual and honest alternatives to traditional relationships, from a Christian perspective, these practices can be seen as attempts to normalize and sanitize what the Bible clearly identifies as sexual immorality and adultery. By using terms like "ethical" or "loving" to describe multiple romantic or sexual partners, society seeks to remove the moral weight of sin, replacing it with personal freedom and self-gratification—hallmarks of a hedonistic culture that prioritizes pleasure over holiness.

I don't care what you want to call it, it's sin!

Several celebrities have publicly identified as being in ENM (Ethical Non-Monogamy) or polyamorous relationships. Here are some well-known figures:

1. Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith – While they have not used the term "polyamorous," they have spoken openly about having a non-traditional marriage, with periods of openness and mutual understanding about non-monogamy.

2. Shailene Woodley – The actress has discussed being open to non-monogamous relationships and not believing that one person can meet all needs in every season of life.

3. Tessa Thompson – She has expressed support for non-monogamous relationships and the idea of love not being confined to traditional norms.

4. Willow Smith – She has openly identified as polyamorous, stating her belief in the freedom to love more than one person in a committed and honest way.

5. Mo’Nique – The comedian and actress has talked about being in an open marriage with her husband, emphasizing honesty and mutual consent.

6. Bella Thorne – She has publicly shared her experiences in polyamorous relationships and her support for alternative relationship structures.

7. Ezra Miller – The actor has been associated with non-traditional, polyamorous relationships and has spoken about living outside societal norms regarding gender and love.

Definitions

Ethical non-monogamy (ENM) is a broad term that encompasses any relationship where individuals are romantically or sexually involved with more than one person, with the understanding and consent of all parties. It's characterized by open communication, mutual respect, and a commitment to ethical behavior within the relationship structure. 

Polyamory is a specific type of ENM where all partners have a romantic and sexual relationship with each other. It's characterized by building and nurturing multiple loving relationships. 

In essence, "ENM poly" highlights the diversity of ENM relationships, with polyamory being one specific type within the broader umbrella of ethical non-monogamy. 

Here are several key Bible verses about adultery, drawn from both the Old and New Testaments:

Old Testament

1. Exodus 20:14 – “You shall not commit adultery.”

(One of the Ten Commandments.)

2. Leviticus 20:10 – “If a man commits adultery with another man's wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress are to be put to death.”

3. Proverbs 6:32 – “But a man who commits adultery has no sense; whoever does so destroys himself.”

4. Proverbs 6:27-29 – “Can a man scoop fire into his lap without his clothes being burned?... So is he who sleeps with another man's wife; no one who touches her will go unpunished.”

New Testament

5. Matthew 5:27-28 – “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”

6. Hebrews 13:4 – “Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure, for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexually immoral.”

7. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 – “Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God?... neither the sexually immoral nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men... will inherit the kingdom of God.”

8. John 8:3-11 – (The story of the woman caught in adultery. Jesus shows mercy but also tells her, “Go now and leave your life of sin.”)

Here is a Christian prayer of repentance that acknowledges the sin of adultery as described in Scripture, even when disguised by modern terminology like ENM (Ethical Non-Monogamy) and polyamry.

A Prayer of Repentance from Adultery and Rededication to Holiness in Marriage

Heavenly Father,

I come before You in humility and brokenness of heart, acknowledging my sin and rebellion against Your holy standard. Lord, You are pure, faithful, and just. Your Word declares that marriage is a sacred covenant between one man and one woman, a reflection of Christ’s love for His Church. Yet I confess that I have strayed from Your truth.

I have allowed myself to be influenced by the deceptive language of this age—terms like "ethical non-monogamy" and "polyamory" that seek to justify what Your Word clearly calls adultery. I confess that I have sinned. I have broken covenant. I have defiled the sacredness of marriage and pursued my own desires above Your will.

Lord, I repent. I renounce the lies of the enemy and the justifications of the world. I see now that there is no “ethical” way to violate Your commandments. What You have called sin, no human language or cultural shift can make righteous. You have said, "You shall not commit adultery" (Exodus 20:14), and I have transgressed.

Forgive me, O God. Wash me clean by the blood of Jesus Christ. Create in me a clean heart, O Lord, and renew a right spirit within me. Restore what I have broken, and teach me to walk in faithfulness, purity, and holiness.

I rededicate my heart, my body, and my relationships to You. If I am married, I commit to honoring and loving my spouse in covenant faithfulness, forsaking all others.

In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, I pray, Amen!

In His Image

🖼️ In His Image

Who God Created You to Be: A Call to Embrace Your True Identity

A theologically based argument against transgenderism.

“I will praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; marvelous are Your works, and that my soul knows very well.” —Psalm 139:14 (NKJV)

You Are Not a Mistake

Teenager, you are not an accident. You were created by a God who formed you with intention and purpose. Psalm 139 tells us that God knit you together in your mother’s womb. He saw your unformed body and ordained all your days before one came to be (Psalm 139:13–16). That means your biological sex—whether male or female—was not random, but a sacred part of God's plan for your life.

Matthew Henry, in his commentary on Psalm 139, writes: “The formation of a human body, and the placing of an immortal spirit in it, are works to be had in reverence.” You were designed, not decided by human hands or feelings.

Made in His Image

Genesis 1:27 declares: “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.”

To be created “in the image of God” means we reflect His character, order, and creative design. Jameson, Fausset, and Brown comment that male and female together reflect the fullness of God's image. This means both manhood and womanhood are sacred and must be honored—not altered.

When we attempt to change our God-given sex or express a gender that contradicts our biological reality, we are, in essence, saying, “God got it wrong.” This is a dangerous position to take before a holy God. Isaiah 45:9 warns: “Woe to him who strives with his Maker! … Shall the clay say to him who forms it, ‘What are you making?’”

God Knew You Before You Were Born

Jeremiah 1:5 says, “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you; before you were born I sanctified you; I ordained you a prophet to the nations.” God doesn't just know what you are—He knows who you are. Your sex and identity are part of your divine calling. To reject your gender is not just a physical issue—it’s a spiritual one.

Ephesians 2:10 adds, “For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.” Those “good works” include living out the fullness of who He created you to be, including your identity as male or female.

A Warning About Self-Destruction

Proverbs 8:36 says, “All those who hate me love death.” And 1 Corinthians 3:17 warns, “If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will destroy him. For God's temple is holy, and you are that temple.”

Gender reassignment surgeries and hormonal treatments are not just medical procedures—they can be acts of self-harm that damage God's creation. Many who have undergone these transitions have later come to regret it. Stories of de-transitioners—those who return to living in alignment with their birth sex—show the devastating consequences of trying to rewrite God's design.

They speak of physical pain, infertility, mental anguish, and spiritual brokenness. Yet, there is hope: many have found healing through Jesus Christ.

Scripture on Gender Distinctions

Deuteronomy 22:5 says, “A woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman’s garment, for all who do so are an abomination to the Lord your God.” While this was written in an Old Testament context, the moral principle still stands: God created distinct roles and identities for male and female, and He expects us to honor that design.

Romans 1:26–27 further reveals that when people abandon God’s truth, they exchange natural relationships for unnatural ones, leading to brokenness and judgment.

The Power to Be Transformed

But here’s the good news: no one is too far gone for God's healing grace. Romans 12:2 calls us to be “transformed by the renewing of your mind.” 2 Corinthians 5:17 says, “If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new.”

Many people who once identified as the opposite sex have been healed, restored, and redeemed by the power of God’s Spirit. Some were victims of sexual abuse or emotional trauma—roots that can lead to identity confusion. But Jesus came to heal the brokenhearted and set the captives free (Isaiah 61:1).

A Higher Calling

Choosing to live as God created you—honoring your birth sex and gender—is not repression; it’s liberation. It is walking in the highest calling of God for your life. Anything less is to fall short of His best and to miss your divine destiny.

You were made for more than confusion, doubt, and self-destruction. You were made to shine His glory, to build families, to bring life, and to be a witness of the goodness of your Creator.

Final Word to Teens Struggling with their identity 

You are deeply loved. God doesn’t make mistakes. The world may try to confuse you, but God's Word remains true. If you’re struggling, reach out to someone who walks in truth. Seek healing, not from a surgeon’s blade, but from the hands of the Savior who made you in love.

Stay who God made you. Stay whole. Stay His.

Here is pro transgender argument points and corresponding biblical/theological counterpoints:

> I really don't care about the minutiae of an ancient book when it comes to wearing what I want to wear—which is really what the song is about. Jesus wouldn't care about that. Girls and boys, men and women have all worn dresses at different times, depending on cultural and societal trends throughout the centuries.

As for being trans, even back in B.C., there were trans people and those born intersex (with both genitalia). They don’t fit neatly into a book that needed to invent boundaries of right and wrong in order to exist and justify itself.

I don’t deny that there’s a lot of helpful stuff in the Bible, but it’s also exclusionary based on the culture and knowledge available at the time.

As soon as someone can tell me how being trans actively harms other people, then I’ll care—but such an irrefutable argument doesn’t exist.

Point-Form Breakdown

Argument Points

1. The Bible is an ancient book full of minutiae that doesn't apply today.

2. Jesus wouldn't care about clothing or what people wear.

3. Clothing norms have changed culturally—men and women have worn dresses.

4. Trans and intersex people existed even in ancient times.

5. The Bible is a man-made system of invented moral boundaries.

6. The Bible is exclusionary due to its limited cultural and historical context.

7. Being transgender doesn’t actively harm anyone, so it shouldn’t matter.

Biblical/Theological Counterpoints

1. The Bible is God's timeless Word, not outdated minutiae.

“All Scripture is God-breathed…” (2 Tim. 3:16) – It's eternally relevant and divinely authoritative.

2. Jesus cares deeply about how we live—including how we present ourselves.

“Do not think I have come to abolish the Law… but to fulfill it” (Matt. 5:17)

Holiness includes honoring God’s design in all things.

3. Clothing styles may change, but gender distinction remains a biblical principle.

Deuteronomy 22:5 – Not about fashion, but honoring God’s created order.

Genesis 1:27 – Male and female were created with intentional design.

4. Intersex conditions reflect the fall, not a third category of gender.

Romans 8:20–22 shows the world is broken—God’s design remains, even when nature is marred.

5. Moral boundaries in Scripture come from God's nature, not human invention.

Here is a theological response to each point made above. 

Here's a theologically grounded biblical refutation of the statement, approached with both clarity and conviction, while also acknowledging the need for compassion:

Refuting Cultural Relativism and Gender Redefinition from a Biblical Perspective

The statement presented reflects a modern, individualistic worldview rooted in subjective morality and postmodern thought, which often prioritizes personal expression over objective truth. While it's true that clothing styles have shifted across cultures and centuries, the Bible is not concerned with superficial fashion trends but with the heart behind those choices and the created order that God established from the beginning.

1. The Bible Is Not “Just an Ancient Book”

Dismissing Scripture as an “ancient book” overlooks its claim to divine authorship. “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16). It is not simply a cultural artifact—it is God’s eternal Word that transcends time and culture. Jesus Himself affirmed the authority of Scripture: “Your word is truth” (John 17:17).

2. Jesus Does Care—Because He Upholds Creation Order

To say “Jesus wouldn’t care about what people wear” misunderstands His mission. Jesus came not to abolish the Law but to fulfill it (Matthew 5:17). He called His followers to holiness in all areas of life, including how we present ourselves, which reflects our submission to God’s design. Deuteronomy 22:5 states, “A woman shall not wear a man's garment, nor shall a man put on a woman's cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD your God.” While this law was given in an Old Testament context, it reflects a broader biblical theme: honoring the distinctiveness of male and female as created by God (Genesis 1:27).

3. Cultural Variability Doesn’t Erase God’s Design

Yes, garments differ culturally. But God's Word doesn't legislate specific fashion; it calls us to respect His created distinctions. Jesus affirmed the creation order when He said, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female” (Matthew 19:4). This isn’t cultural. It's creational. The blurring of male and female identity strikes at the heart of God's design.

4. Intersex and Trans Identity Do Not Refute the Bible

It’s true that intersex individuals exist, and their condition is a result of living in a fallen world (Romans 8:20-22). But rare biological anomalies don't redefine the created categories of male and female. The existence of physical brokenness does not negate God’s original design—it highlights our need for redemption.

As for transgenderism, Scripture consistently presents gender as tied to biological sex, not internal feeling. Our identity is found not in self-perception, but in Christ (Colossians 3:3). The call of the gospel is not to affirm ourselves, but to deny ourselves, take up our cross, and follow Him (Luke 9:23).

5. The Bible’s Moral Boundaries Are Not Exclusionary but Loving

The claim that the Bible “invented boundaries of right and wrong” misunderstands the nature of divine revelation. God's commands flow from His character—He defines right and wrong because He is holy and just. Far from being exclusionary, the gospel is radically inclusive: “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved” (Romans 10:13). But inclusion does not mean affirmation of all behavior—it means transformation from all sin through grace.

6. The Harm of Transgenderism Is Real, Though Often Ignored

While the statement asserts no harm comes from transgender identities, this ignores significant evidence—spiritual, emotional, and societal harm. God does not give arbitrary commands. When we deviate from His design, the consequences are real. Confusion, depression, broken relationships, and a loss of identity plague many who pursue transition. The gospel offers not just affirmation, but healing and wholeness in Christ.

Conclusion

The issue is not clothing, culture, or even identity—it is whether we will trust God's design or our own desires. The Bible does not exclude to oppress; it calls all people to repentance so they might find life. Jesus would—and does—care deeply, because He is Lord not just of hearts, but of bodies, gender, and identity. His invitation is to come as you are—but not to stay as you are. He loves us too much for that.

Poem

Here is a poem that powerfully affirms biblical truth about being made in God's image, the sanctity of our God-given sex and gender, and the spiritual danger of rejecting that design—presented in a tone of conviction and reverence for the Creator:

“In His Image”

In secret deep, where no eye sees,
He knit my frame with holy ease.
Before my cry, before my name,
He shaped me male—and called it good—unchanged, the same.

No accident, no twist of fate,
My form was fashioned by His grace.
Not mine to alter, shift, or trade,
For I am fearfully and wondrously made.

In His own image I was formed,
Not blurred, not bent, but whole, adorned.
His breath gave life, His hands gave shape,
And in that truth, I find escape.

Yet lies now creep through every gate,
Where children learn to doubt their state.
Taught to war against their frame,
To curse the gift, to scorn their name.

A boy’s not girl, a girl’s not boy—
To blur this line is to destroy.
It sterilizes, strips the seed,
Denies the womb, rejects the need.

No sons to raise, no daughters born,
A future lost, a promise torn.
This is not freedom, this is chains—
A soul at war, a heart in flames.

To mutilate the work of God,
To scorn the ground where He has trod—
Is blasphemy, and deep within,
A soul cries out, confused by sin.

O Church, arise, speak truth with grace,
Let mercy shine in every face.
But never bow to Satan’s plan—
To unmake woman, to undo man.

Stand firm in love, in truth proclaim:
Our sex is gift, not curse or shame.
Return, O heart, to what is true—
God made you you—not someone new.

In womb, in flesh, He called you known.
So live as His, and His alone.
For in His image we were made,
And in that truth, we shall not fade.

Here is a heartfelt prayer based on the article—designed for personal healing, repentance, deliverance, and spiritual renewal through the truth of God's Word and the power of the Holy Spirit:

🙏 A Prayer for Healing, Identity, and Deliverance

Heavenly Father,

I come before You in the name of Jesus Christ, humbled and broken, yet hopeful—because You are a God of mercy, truth, and transformation.

Lord, Your Word says that I am fearfully and wonderfully made (Psalm 139:14), formed by Your hands in my mother’s womb, and created in Your image and likeness (Genesis 1:27). You are not the author of confusion, but of peace and order (1 Corinthians 14:33). You made me with purpose—body, soul, and spirit—and You declared it good.

Today, I repent for any way I have believed lies about my identity. I renounce every sin and deception connected to gender confusion, transgenderism, and homosexuality. I reject every false identity that the world, the enemy, or my own pain has tried to place on me. Forgive me, Lord, for any way I have dishonored the body You created or doubted Your perfect design for my life.

Father, wash me clean by the blood of Jesus. Create in me a pure heart and renew a right spirit within me (Psalm 51:10). Fill every broken place with Your healing love. I surrender my thoughts, feelings, and body to You as a living sacrifice (Romans 12:1), holy and pleasing in Your sight.

I declare Your truth over my life: I am who You say I am. I was born male (or female) by Your design, and I will live out that identity to glorify You. Restore to me the joy of being Your creation. Let me walk boldly in the sex and gender You gave me—not with shame, but with honor.

Holy Spirit, come now and fill me. Renew my mind and break every stronghold. Heal every wound caused by abuse, confusion, rejection, or trauma. Let Your Word dwell richly in me and transform me day by day (Romans 12:2; Colossians 3:16).

Father, I pray not only for myself, but for every young heart lost in confusion. Open their eyes, draw them with Your love, and raise up voices of truth and compassion. Let this generation rise up in purity, holiness, and boldness to proclaim Your goodness and design.

I commit my body, my mind, and my future to You. May I honor You with all that I am, as male or female, made in Your image.

In the mighty name of the Lord Jesus Christ,
Amen.

Live And Let Live?

Would Jesus really say 'live and let live'?! 

I never read that in the Bible.

Promoting LGBT in the name of tolerance is not a biblical concept, or that Jesus ever promoted.

While I don't judge others challenges for who or where they find themselves in life, including those in the LGBT community, I do recognize absolutes as far as standards presented in Christianity. It continues to be a controversial subject concerning human sexuality and gender expression. Religion and humanism seem to have contrary views on this subject. 

Here's a theological summary to consider.

Did Jesus ever teach the concept of "live and let live"?

The phrase "live and let live" isn't directly quoted in the Bible, but the concept is partially reflected in some of Jesus’ teachings—though with some differences.

"Live and let live" usually means letting others do what they want without interference, even if you disagree. Jesus, however, took a more active approach to love, truth, and righteousness. Here's how his teachings compare:

1. Judgment and Mercy

Matthew 7:1-2 (NIV): "Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged."

This is often seen as a "live and let live"-type statement, but Jesus was talking more about hypocrisy and harsh judgment, not about ignoring right and wrong.

2. Loving Your Neighbor

Matthew 22:39: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”

This encourages respect and kindness, which aligns with the spirit of letting others be.

3. Calling Out Sin, Gently

Jesus didn’t shy away from confronting sin, but he did so with love and often in private (e.g., the woman caught in adultery – John 8:1-11). He told her, “Neither do I condemn you… Go now and leave your life of sin.”

Not “live and let live” in the hands-off sense, but rather merciful and redemptive.

Summary:

Jesus taught love, mercy, and not being judgmental, which aligns a bit with the spirit of "live and let live," but he also called people to repentance and a transformation changed life, which goes beyond that concept. His approach was loving engagement, not passive tolerance.

Many of us are guilty of offering a quick “How are you?” without taking time to build deeper relationships. Even unintentionally, we can become so absorbed in our own lives that we forget to reach out and genuinely care about how others are doing or what they may be struggling with. But Scripture calls us to something more.

From the beginning, God emphasized the importance of community. When He created Eve, it was to provide Adam with a companion—a partner comparable to him (Genesis 2:18: “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.”). This shows that meaningful connection has always been part of God’s design for humanity.

Hebrews 10:24–25 also reminds us of the need to stay engaged with one another: “And let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds, not giving up meeting together... but encouraging one another.” True community requires time, intention, and involvement.

“Live and Let Live” Discourages Exhortation and Evangelism

The modern “Live and let live” mindset says we shouldn’t interfere in other people’s lives—even if we know they’re heading in a harmful or sinful direction. But the Bible tells a different story. It calls us to care enough to speak truth in love and not turn a blind eye.

Galatians 6:1 says: “Brothers and sisters, if someone is caught in a sin, you who live by the Spirit should restore that person gently.” Likewise, Ezekiel 33:8 warns of the danger of silence: “If I say to the wicked, ‘You wicked person, you will surely die,’ and you do not speak out to dissuade them... I will hold you accountable for their blood.”

And of course, the Great Commission makes evangelism a clear calling: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations...” (Matthew 28:19). We are not called to passive tolerance but to loving, courageous involvement.

Here's a refined version of your message, keeping your tone and heart intact while tightening up the structure and flow. Scripture references are preserved and clearly connected to your points:

It’s important to clarify something: while we’re called to care for others, it is not our place to condemn them. Judgment in the sense of final condemnation belongs to God alone—the Supreme Judge (James 4:12). However, Scripture does call us to exhort, warn, and lovingly correct—especially within the body of Christ.

Ezekiel 33:1–11 paints a powerful picture of this responsibility. God describes the role of the watchman—someone who sees danger coming and sounds the alarm. If the people ignore the warning, their blood is on their own hands. But if the watchman stays silent, he will be held accountable. Verses 6–7 say:

> “But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet... his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand. So you, son of man: I have made you a watchman... therefore you shall hear a word from My mouth and warn them for Me.”

As followers of Christ, we are all watchmen in a way. We are charged with warning others about sin and its consequences—not from a place of superiority, but from a place of love and obedience.

The philosophy of “Live and let live” tells us to mind our own business. But how can we fulfill our calling if we embrace that mindset? How can we proclaim the truth of the gospel or call others to repentance if we believe it’s not our place to speak?

Jesus commands us in Matthew 28:19–20:

> “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations... teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you.”

And Paul reminds us in Ephesians 4:15 that we are to “speak the truth in love”, helping the body of Christ grow and mature in unity and faith.

Colossians 3:16 (NKJV) further urges us:

> “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom, teaching and admonishing one another…”

That word “admonish” means to caution, advise, or urge—to lovingly redirect a fellow believer when they’ve strayed.

We are not called to be passive observers of others’ choices, especially within the Church. We are called to love people enough to speak up, to point them back to Christ, and to help them walk in the fullness of relationship with Him.

As followers of Christ, we are called to uphold and reflect His truth — to live by the moral standards revealed through Scripture, not as a means of judgment, but as a light that guides us toward freedom, purpose, and wholeness. These standards are not burdens, but invitations to become who we were truly created to be.

Yet, we must never forget: every person is on a journey. We all wrestle with weakness, wounds, and questions. None of us has arrived. So when we speak of God's ways, we do so not to condemn, but to lovingly point toward a better way — the way of grace, truth, and transformation.

To those whose lives may not align with Christian teaching, we say this with sincerity: you are loved. You matter. You were made with purpose and beauty. We do not judge you, for we too have fallen short and continue to rely daily on God's mercy.

Our desire is not to change you with force or fear, but to bless you with hope — that you would discover the fullness of who you are in God’s eyes, and that in time, you may come to walk in the richness of His design for your life. Until then, we walk beside you with love, not above you in pride.

So, what do you think about “Live and let live”? Does it line up with what Scripture teaches, or is it a mindset we need to challenge? Let’s talk about it in the comments—I’d love to hear your thoughts!

Speaking In Tongues

Here’s a list of the different types of tongues mentioned in the New Testament, along with scriptural references:

1. Human Languages (Known Languages) – Acts 2:4-11

Description: This refers to speaking in a real, earthly language that the speaker has not learned but that others can understand.
Reference:
"And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. … And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?" (Acts 2:4, 8)

---

2. The Gift of Speaking in Tongues (A Supernatural Gift for Edification) – 1 Corinthians 12:10, 12:28-30

Description: A gift of the Holy Spirit enabling a believer to speak in tongues as a sign or for the edification of the church when interpreted.
Reference:
"To another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues." (1 Corinthians 12:10)
"Are all apostles? Are all prophets? … Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret?" (1 Corinthians 12:29-30)

---

3. Speaking Mysteries unto God (A Private Prayer Language) – 1 Corinthians 14:2

Description: This type of tongues is for personal edification, as the speaker communicates with God in a language that no man understands.
Reference:
"For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries." (1 Corinthians 14:2)

---

4. Groanings in the Spirit (Inexpressible Prayer by the Holy Spirit) – Romans 8:26

Description: This is a deep, wordless prayer where the Holy Spirit intercedes through groanings that cannot be expressed in human language.
Reference:
"Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered." (Romans 8:26)

---

Summary:

• Human Tongues (Known Languages) – Acts 2:4-11
• The Gift of Speaking in Tongues (for the Church) – 1 Corinthians 12:10, 28-30
• Speaking Mysteries unto God (Prayer Language) – 1 Corinthians 14:2
• Groanings in the Spirit (Intercession by the Holy Spirit) – Romans 8:26

Each of these forms of tongues serves a different purpose—whether for evangelism, edification, personal communion with God, or intercession.

Facts about Westcott and Hort - NIV

Facts about Westcott and Hort:

Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) were the two English "scholars" who produced the corrupt Greek text of the modern versions. Their dominating influence on the revision committee of 1871-1881 accounts for most of the corruption that we have today in modern translations. The Bible believer should keep several points in mind when discussing these two men. The following information are these: 

1. Together, the Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott and the Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort run over 1,800 pages. A personal salvation testimony is not given once for either man, and the name "Jesus" is found only nine times!

2. Westcott was a firm believer in Mary worship, and Hort claimed that Mary worship had a lot in common with Jesus worship.

3. Hort believed in keeping Roman Catholic sacraments.

4. Hort believed in baptismal regeneration as taught in the Catholic church.

5. Hort rejected the infallibility of Scripture.

6. Hort took great interest in the works of Charles Darwin, while both he and Westcott rejected the literal account of Creation.

7. Westcott did not believe in the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, the Millennium, or a literal Heaven.

8. Both men rejected the doctrine of a literal Hell, and they supported prayers for the dead in purgatory.

9. Hort refused to believe in the Holy Trinity.

10. Hort refused to believe in angels.

11. Westcott confessed that he was a communist by nature.

12. Hort confessed that he hated democracy in all it's forms.

13. Westcott also did his share of beer drinking. In fact, only twelve years after the Revised Version was published, Westcott was a spokesman for a brewery.

14. While working on their Greek text (1851-1871), and while working on the Revision Committee for the Revised Version (1871-1881), Westcott and Hort were also keeping company with "seducing spirits and doctrines of devils" (1 Timothy 4:1). Both men took great interest in occult practices and clubs. They started the Hermes Club in 1845, the Ghostly Guild in 1851, and Hort joined a secret club called The Apostles in the same year. They also started the Eranus Club in 1872. These were spiritualists groups which believed in such unscriptural practices as communicating with the dead (necromancy).

15. The Westcott and Hort Greek text was SECRETLY given to the Revision Committee.

16. The members of the Revision Committee of 1881 were sworn to a pledge of secrecy in regard to the new Greek text being used, and they met in silence for ten years.

17. The corrupt Greek text of Westcott and Hort was not released to the public until just five days before the debut of the Revised Version. This prevented Bible-believing scholars like Dean Burgon from reviewing it and exposing it for the piece of trash that it was.

Does this sound like an HONEST work of God or a DISHONEST work of the Devil?

NIV FALSE BIBLE VERSION

Many King James Only (KJV-Only) advocates believe that the New International Version (NIV) and other modern Bible translations are corrupt because they rely on different manuscript sources, primarily the Alexandrian texts. These arguments come from scholars and preachers who hold to the Textus Receptus (Received Text) and believe the King James Version (KJV) is the only true and preserved Word of God. Below is a summary of their main objections to the NIV and the Alexandrian texts.

Reasons Why KJV-Only Advocates Reject the NIV

1. Missing and Altered Verses

KJV-Only scholars argue that the NIV omits or changes key verses that support core Christian doctrines. Some examples include:

Matthew 17:21 – ("Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.") – Missing in the NIV.

Mark 16:9-20 – The longer ending of Mark is either omitted or footnoted in modern translations.

Acts 8:37 – A verse affirming belief in Christ before baptism is omitted.

1 John 5:7 – The Johannine Comma, supporting the Trinity, is removed or footnoted.

2. Use of Alexandrian Manuscripts

The NIV relies on older manuscripts from Alexandria, Egypt (Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus), while the KJV is based on the Textus Receptus.

KJV-Only scholars argue that the Alexandrian texts were corrupted by Gnostic influences or deliberate alterations by early scribes.

3. Changes in Christology (Diminishing Jesus’ Divinity)

Critics claim the NIV subtly weakens the doctrine of Christ’s deity. For example:

1 Timothy 3:16

KJV: "God was manifest in the flesh…"

NIV: "He appeared in the flesh…" (Removes "God")

Philippians 2:6

KJV: "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God…"

NIV: "Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage…" (Different meaning)

4. Westcott and Hort Connection

The scholars who influenced modern critical Greek texts (Westcott & Hort) are accused of having theological liberalism and occult interests.

KJV-Only teachers claim their Greek text was biased toward Roman Catholic and rationalist influences.

5. Paraphrased or Dynamic Equivalence Translation

The NIV uses a more thought-for-thought translation method, while the KJV is word-for-word.

This results in theological shifts that KJV-Only advocates believe distort God’s message.

6. Ecumenical and Liberal Bias

Some KJV defenders believe modern translations, including the NIV, were influenced by ecumenism, diluting biblical truth.

The NIV’s translation committee included scholars with theological liberalism, which raises suspicion among KJV supporters

Why the Alexandrian Texts Are Considered Corrupt

1. Origin in Egypt

Egypt is often associated with corruption in the Bible (e.g., Deuteronomy 17:16, Revelation 11:8).

KJV-Only advocates argue that God would not preserve His pure Word in a place known for heresies.

2. Missing Passages

The Alexandrian manuscripts often lack entire sections of Scripture (e.g., John 7:53-8:11, Mark 16:9-20), which raises suspicion of tampering.

3. Influence of Gnostic Thought

Some scholars believe early Alexandrian scribes were influenced by Gnosticism, a heretical belief system that distorts Christian doctrine.

4. Contradictions Among the Manuscripts

The Alexandrian texts (Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus) often disagree with each other, suggesting they are not reliable.

References from KJV-Only Scholars

1. Dr. David Otis Fuller – Which Bible? (Argues for the superiority of the Textus Receptus and exposes problems with modern translations.)

2. Dr. Peter Ruckman – The Christian’s Handbook of Manuscript Evidence (Strongly argues against the NIV and modern textual criticism.)

3. Gail Riplinger – New Age Bible Versions (Claims the NIV and other versions are influenced by New Age doctrines.)

4. Dr. Edward F. Hills – The King James Version Defended (Argues that the KJV is the providentially preserved Word of God.)

5. Dean John William Burgon – The Revision Revised (Criticized Westcott & Hort’s Greek text, defending the Traditional Text.)

Conclusion

KJV-Only scholars reject the NIV because they believe it is based on corrupt Alexandrian manuscripts, removes key doctrines, and was influenced by liberal theology. They argue that the KJV, based on the Textus Receptus and the Masoretic Text, is the true, preserved Word of God.

Here is a list of altered and missing verses in the NIV compared to the King James Version (KJV), along with explanations of why KJV-Only advocates believe these changes are erroneous and dangerous to Christian doctrine.

Missing Verses in the NIV

The following verses are completely removed from the NIV. In many cases, they are footnoted but not included in the main text.

These omissions are troubling to KJV-Only believers because they remove key doctrinal statements about salvation, fasting, spiritual warfare, and the reality of hell.

Altered Verses in the NIV (Doctrinal Changes)

In many cases, the NIV changes words or phrases, subtly affecting doctrine. Below are some examples of serious alterations.

1. 1 Timothy 3:16 – The Deity of Christ

KJV: "God was manifest in the flesh…"

NIV: "He appeared in the flesh…"

Issue: The NIV removes "God" and replaces it with "He," making the verse ambiguous. The KJV affirms that Jesus is God, while the NIV weakens this doctrine.

2. Colossians 1:14 – The Blood of Christ

KJV: "In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins."

NIV: "In whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins."

Issue: The NIV removes "through his blood," downplaying the importance of Christ’s blood for redemption (Hebrews 9:22).

3. Isaiah 14:12 – Lucifer Becomes "Morning Star"

KJV: "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning!"

NIV: "How you have fallen from heaven, morning star, son of the dawn!"

Issue: "Morning Star" is a title given to Jesus in Revelation 22:16. The NIV confuses Lucifer (Satan) with Christ, creating a theological problem.

4. Luke 4:4 – The Word of God Omitted

KJV: "Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God."

NIV: "Man shall not live on bread alone."

Issue: The NIV removes "but by every word of God," weakening the doctrine of Scriptural authority.

5. 1 John 5:7 – The Trinity Weakened

KJV: "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."

NIV: "For there are three that testify."

Issue: The NIV removes a clear statement of the Trinity, weakening the biblical defense of this doctrine.

6. Philippians 2:6 – Christ’s Equality with God Changed

KJV: "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God."

NIV: "Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage."

Issue: The NIV implies that Jesus wasn’t equal with God, contradicting the doctrine of Christ’s divinity.

7. Micah 5:2 – Christ’s Eternality Altered

KJV: "Whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting."

NIV: "Whose origins are from of old, from ancient times."

Issue: The KJV affirms that Jesus is eternal, while the NIV makes it sound like He had an origin.

8. Mark 1:2 – Prophecy Misattributed

KJV: "As it is written in the prophets, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face…"

NIV: "As it is written in Isaiah the prophet…"

Issue: The prophecy quoted is actually from Malachi 3:1 and Isaiah 40:3. The NIV incorrectly attributes it only to Isaiah, creating an error.

9. Daniel 3:25 – The Fourth Man in the Fire Changed

KJV: "The fourth is like the Son of God."

NIV: "The fourth looks like a son of the gods."

Issue: The KJV points to Jesus Christ appearing in the fire, while the NIV makes it sound like a pagan deity.

10. Acts 2:30 – Christ's Resurrection Prophecy Weakened

KJV: "…according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne."

NIV: "…he would place one of his descendants on his throne."

Issue: The KJV directly states that Christ will sit on David’s throne, while the NIV weakens the prophecy by making it generic.

Conclusion: Why These Changes Are Problematic

1. Weakened Christology – Many NIV changes diminish Jesus’ deity, eternal existence, and equality with God.

2. Removal of Key Doctrines – The blood of Christ, fasting, the Trinity, and the necessity of God’s Word are all downplayed or removed.

3. Confusion in Prophecy – The NIV misattributes prophecies or alters meanings, leading to theological errors.

4. Corrupt Manuscript Sources – The NIV is based on Alexandrian manuscripts, which omit or modify verses, whereas the KJV is based on the Textus Receptus, which KJV-Only advocates believe is the preserved Word of God.

1 Corinthians 6:9 Effeminate

The NIV is a blasphemous trash doctrine, that should not be used by anyone! 

The effeminate are deceived and will not inherit the kingdom of God 1 Cor 6:9. This is blasphemous and antithetical.

You should be presenting yourself as a man created in the image of God.

People who use the (NIV) Bible (per)version think that it doesn’t say that. What version do you use?

"Be not deceived" (misled) .... In other words if you think the following list is not sin, then you are deceived...

"effeminate" effeminate perverts, homoerotic partners, 

Strongs concordance: Strong's Number - G3120

Greek: μαλακός

Transliteration: malakos

Pronunciation: mal-ak-os'

Definition: Of uncertain affinity;

soft that is fine (clothing); figuratively a catamite: - effeminate soft.

KJV Usage: soft (3x), effeminate (1x).

Occurs: 4

In verses: 3

KJV is the true version of the Bible.

Niv is a false translation, based on the textual criticism of "Westcott and Hort," two prominent 19th-century scholars whose Greek text was used as a foundation for the NIV.

These scholars favored a "Alexandrian" text type, which often differed from the "Byzantine" text traditionally used in many translations. This Alexandrian text sometimes had variations in wording compared to the Byzantine, leading to different interpretations in certain passages when translated into English.

The NIV translates malakoi as “male prostitutes.” The male prostitute was “soft” because he took the passive role in sexual relations with other men. Paul made up the word arsenokoitai. It was never used before Paul in any writing of the ancient world.

St Paul used this word "soft" to describe the effeminine prostitutes. He used the word effeminate to describe men who appeared to be women. The fact that they were prostitutes is a reference to them having homosexual relations with men who were not effeminine, but homosexual. The verse clearly states that it is quote the effeminate that will not inherit the kingdom of God. Irregardless of them being prostitutes. It is the blasphemy that is an expression antithetical to their sex which God created male and female. You are the express image of God and as such should conduct yourself accordance with this expression, not expressing yourself in such a testimony that is diametrically opposed to what is natural. Be true too yourself or to thine own self be true. 

If you thoroughly compare the NIV and the King James version you will soon discover from its historical documentation and translation that both are erroneous and filled with errors. 

Most translations translate the word effeminate, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that if a man is soft then he is effeminate. You should also consider the fact that if you represent yourself as the opposite sex and your expression you are more than likely attracting same sex partners. I would question whether or not you are homosexual or not. If so this is another issue that this very same verse brings up. 

Here is a video on YouTube explaining some of the errors of the NIV translation. 

https://youtu.be/7_sjTF1APAw?si=sPfJ5RAIZPqpDiBV

The same publishing company Zondervan which produces the NIV Bible also publishes the Satanic Bible and The Joy of Gay Sex.