Mormons Are Christian's?

---

Mormon's are Christians?

Joseph Smith (1805–1844) was the most deceptive and fraudulent Mormon "prophet" of the 19th century—period.
A cunning and deceitful womanizer, he led millions astray.

Joseph Smith was a complete fraud—a false prophet through and through. He had approximately 40 wives, including his youngest, Helen Mar Kimball, who was only 14 years old. He also had an affair with his housekeeper, Fanny Alger, who was just 15.

His wife, Emma Hale, caught him in the barn with Fanny Alger, peering through a crack in the door on their property.
Poor Emma. The so-called elders of the fraudulent church had to be summoned to calm her down. The shock took weeks for her to recover from.

Meanwhile, the poor Mormon followers remained trapped, ensnared by a false prophet leading them toward ruin.

Joseph Smith was a notorious womanizer.

As for the four golden plates containing the so-called "Reformed Egyptian hieroglyphics," which he claimed to have used to translate the fabricated Book of Mormon (Galatians 1:8–9)—where are they now?

We have ancient manuscripts (MSS) that predate Joseph Smith by centuries.
And yet, the golden plates? Conveniently vanished. No evidence to examine.

Smith claimed they were taken away by a so-called angel, Moroni—an invention of his deceitful imagination.

Renowned linguist Charles Anthon was approached by Martin Harris, whom Joseph Smith sent to verify the so-called "Reformed Egyptian" writing. I have a letter from Anthon himself stating that the characters presented to him were nothing but a fraudulent concoction—devised by con artists.

Joseph Smith lied once again, as recorded in Doctrine and Covenants and the History of Joseph Smith, sections 63–65.

Like all his other false prophecies, he claimed, "Thus saith the Lord."

But the Bible says:

"The ancient and honorable, he is the head; and the prophet that teaches lies, he is the tail. For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed."
—Isaiah 9:15–16

If you are a member of the Church of Joseph Smith of Latter-Day Deceivers, flee for the sake of your soul!

And if two missionaries come knocking on your door in their spotless white shirts and black name tags, tell them to repent. Make it clear you have no interest in following a false prophet—then close the door on them immediately. Do not engage with them.

Why Are People Burning the Quran?

Why are people burning the Quran? 

Could it be an influence stemming from an historical event that took place in Ephesus as part of a broader spiritual revival after the Apostle Paul's preaching? 

Those who had practiced sorcery recognized the power of God and demonstrated their repentance by destroying their expensive sorcery books.

The Bible passage from Acts 19:19:

"And a number of those who had practiced sorcery brought their scrolls together and burned them publicly. When they calculated the value of the scrolls, the total came to fifty thousand drachmas."

Why are some people critical of the Quran?

Critiques of the Qur'an as a text often come from theological, historical, or textual perspectives, primarily from Christian or secular viewpoints. Below is a point-by-point summary of common arguments made by critics who claim the Qur'an is not divinely inspired, is anti-Christian, or conflicts with biblical Christianity. These points represent such critiques but do not reflect an endorsement of any particular view:

--- 

1. Contradictions with the Bible

The Qur'an denies the divinity of Jesus Christ (Surah 4:171), while the Bible affirms it (John 1:1, Colossians 2:9).

The Qur'an claims Jesus was not crucified (Surah 4:157), contradicting the central Christian belief in the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus (Luke 23:33, 1 Corinthians 15:3-4).

The Qur'an rejects the concept of the Trinity (Surah 5:73), which is foundational to Christian theology (Matthew 28:19).

Critique: Critics argue that these denials are not compatible with the biblical narrative and label the Qur'an as a distortion or rejection of core Christian doctrines.

---

2. Historical Anachronisms

The Qur'an references events and characters in ways that are historically inaccurate, such as Haman (Surah 28:38) being a servant of Pharaoh, despite his association with the Persian court in the Book of Esther.

Claims that Christians and Jews corrupted their scriptures (Surah 2:75, Surah 5:13) lack historical evidence, as existing biblical manuscripts predate the Qur'an.

Critique: These historical inconsistencies lead critics to question the Qur'an's divine origin.

---

3. Borrowing from Other Sources

The Qur'an includes stories resembling apocryphal Jewish and Christian texts, such as the story of the Seven Sleepers (Surah 18:9-26) and tales about Mary.

Critics claim these stories were adapted from non-canonical sources, such as the Infancy Gospel of Thomas or Talmudic traditions.

Critique: Critics argue that the Qur'an is a compilation of pre-existing myths and legends rather than divine revelation.

---

4. Antichrist Teachings

The Qur'an denies Jesus as the Son of God (Surah 9:30) and His role as the Savior, which Christians view as antichrist teachings based on 1 John 2:22: "Who is the liar? It is whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a person is the antichrist—denying the Father and the Son."

Critique: Christians see the denial of Jesus’ divinity and role as Savior as directly opposing the Christian faith.

---

5. Lack of Miracles by Muhammad

The Qur'an states that Muhammad performed no miracles (Surah 6:37), unlike the prophets of the Bible, whose miraculous deeds confirmed their divine calling (e.g., Moses, Elijah, Jesus).

Critique: Critics argue that the absence of miracles undermines Muhammad’s claim to prophethood.

---

6. Ethical and Moral Concerns

Critics point to verses in the Qur'an that condone violence, such as fighting against non-believers (Surah 9:5, Surah 9:29).

The Qur'an allows practices like polygamy (Surah 4:3) and slavery, which some view as incompatible with Christian ethics and the teachings of Jesus.

Critique: These ethical issues lead critics to question whether the Qur'an aligns with divine standards.

---

7. Lack of Fulfilled Prophecy

Unlike the Bible, which contains numerous fulfilled prophecies (e.g., Isaiah 53 about the Messiah), critics argue that the Qur'an lacks verifiable predictive prophecies.

Critique: Critics claim this absence diminishes its credibility as divine revelation.

---

8. Anti-Christian Rhetoric

The Qur'an criticizes Christians for believing in Jesus’ divinity and the Trinity, calling such beliefs blasphemy (Surah 5:72-73).

It condemns those who say "God has a son" (Surah 19:88-92) and predicts severe punishment for such claims.

Critique: Critics view this rhetoric as explicitly anti-Christian and in opposition to biblical teachings.

---

9. Self-Referential Claims of Authority

The Qur'an asserts its own authority as the final revelation (Surah 2:2, Surah 33:40) without external verification or prophetic confirmation.

Critique: Critics argue that the Qur’an’s self-authentication lacks the evidentiary basis found in biblical prophecy and miracles.

---

10. Changes in Revelation (Abrogation)

The Qur'an acknowledges that some verses abrogate others (Surah 2:106, Surah 16:101), leading to accusations of inconsistency in divine revelation.

Critique: Critics argue that an all-knowing God would not change His mind or provide contradictory instructions.

---

Conclusion

Critics of the Qur'an argue that it is a human-made text influenced by pre-existing religious and cultural traditions, filled with theological, historical, and ethical inconsistencies. From a Christian perspective, it is viewed as anti-Christian and antichrist because it denies core biblical doctrines about Jesus Christ, His divinity, and salvation. These arguments form the basis of the claim that the Qur'an is a forgery and not divinely inspired.

The gospel of Barnabas?

#ThegospelofBarnabas is fake!

The Gospel of Barnabas is widely regarded by scholars and historians as a forgery or pseudepigraphical work. It is not considered a canonical gospel in Christianity, nor does it hold significant credibility within Islamic or Jewish traditions.

Some key reasons for this assessment include:

1. Historical Anachronisms: The text contains numerous historical errors, including references to concepts and practices that did not exist during the time of Jesus or Barnabas, such as the use of medieval feudal terms and descriptions of the Muslim Shahada.

2. Language and Style: The language and style of the work suggest it was written in the late medieval period, likely in the 14th or 15th century, long after the time of Barnabas, who was a companion of Paul in the New Testament.

3. Discrepancies with Early Christian Writings: The Gospel of Barnabas contradicts both the New Testament and other early Christian texts, as well as historical Islamic teachings. It presents an unusual account of Jesus' life that aligns with neither Christian nor mainstream Islamic theology.

4. Unknown Provenance: The earliest known manuscripts of the Gospel of Barnabas date to the 16th century, and there is no evidence of its existence before then.

Most scholars believe the text was written to promote specific theological or political agendas during the Middle Ages, likely by someone familiar with both Christianity and Islam. It is not accepted as an authentic work by any major religious tradition.

News video https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1A6SFnsVaq/

The King James Bible does not include a number of ancient writings that are considered apocryphal or pseudepigraphal (false or spurious writings), many of which claim to be gospels or texts about Jesus and the apostles. Here's a list of notable counterfeit or excluded gospels, along with general scholarly perspectives on their significance:

---

1. Gospel of Thomas

• Date: 2nd century AD
• Content: A collection of 114 sayings attributed to Jesus, often esoteric in nature, with Gnostic overtones.
• Why Excluded: It does not align with orthodox Christian theology and emphasizes secret knowledge.
• Scholarly Value: Rated highly for historical insight into early Christian sects but rejected as Scripture by the early church.

---

2. Gospel of Judas

• Date: 2nd century AD
• Content: Depicts Judas Iscariot not as a betrayer but as a favored disciple who acts at Jesus' request.
• Why Excluded: Promotes Gnostic beliefs that contradict mainstream Christian teachings.
• Scholarly Value: Fascinating for understanding Gnosticism but rated low for theological relevance.

---

3. Gospel of Peter

• Date: Late 2nd century AD
• Content: Focuses on the Passion narrative but includes fanciful details (e.g., a talking cross).
• Why Excluded: Contains theological errors and embellishments.
• Scholarly Value: Moderate; important for studying early Christian literary creativity.

---

4. Infancy Gospel of Thomas

• Date: 2nd-3rd century AD
• Content: Describes Jesus' childhood with miraculous events and mischief (e.g., killing a boy and resurrecting him).
• Why Excluded: Theologically unsound and filled with legendary material.
• Scholarly Value: Interesting for folklore studies but theologically rated very low.

---

5. Protoevangelium of James

• Date: 2nd century AD
• Content: Focuses on the birth and upbringing of Mary, the mother of Jesus.
• Why Excluded: Contains embellishments and legends not consistent with canonical Scripture.
• Scholarly Value: High for Marian studies but low for doctrinal accuracy.

---

6. Acts of Paul and Thecla

• Date: 2nd century AD
• Content: Tells the story of a female disciple of Paul named Thecla, who performs miracles.
• Why Excluded: Considered fictional and inconsistent with Pauline theology.
• Scholarly Value: Useful for studying early Christian perspectives on women but not as Scripture.

---

7. Gospel of Mary (Magdalene)

• Date: 2nd century AD
• Content: Features Mary Magdalene as a prominent disciple and teacher, emphasizing secret knowledge.
• Why Excluded: Gnostic in nature and promotes views counter to orthodox Christian doctrine.
• Scholarly Value: High for gender studies and Gnostic thought, but not canonical.

---

8. Gospel of the Egyptians

• Date: 2nd century AD
• Content: Includes esoteric teachings of Jesus, heavily influenced by Gnostic ideology.
• Why Excluded: Rejects bodily resurrection and orthodox teachings.
• Scholarly Value: Significant for understanding early Christian diversity.

---

9. Gospel of Philip

• Date: 3rd century AD
• Content: A Gnostic gospel with mystical sayings, including speculation on Jesus’ relationship with Mary Magdalene.
• Why Excluded: Heretical views inconsistent with Christian theology.
• Scholarly Value: Valuable for studying Gnosticism but irrelevant for orthodoxy.

---

10. The Didache

• Date: Late 1st or early 2nd century AD
• Content: A manual for Christian living and church practices, including teachings on baptism and communion.
• Why Excluded: Not a counterfeit gospel but excluded because it is more of a church manual than inspired Scripture.
• Scholarly Value: Highly rated for historical church practices.

11. Gospel of Barnabas

Date: Likely written in the 14th-16th century AD

Content: Claims that Jesus was a prophet, denies His divinity, and states that Muhammad was the final prophet, aligning with Islamic theology.

Why Excluded: Not an ancient document; it is a medieval forgery with anachronisms, written to support Islamic views of Jesus.

Scholarly Value: Very low, as it lacks credibility and historical accuracy.

---

Summary of Ratings

• Scholarly interest: High for understanding early Christianity and sectarian movements.
• Canonical value: Low due to doctrinal errors, Gnostic influence, or fictional elements.

The King James Bible excluded these texts because they lacked apostolic authorship, consistent theology, or broad acceptance in the early church.

Beware of False Prophets Fortune Tell

Do not claim to be a Christian or a prophet of God if you are engaging in fortune-telling or channeling information through familiar spirits. Such actions align you with the deceiver, not with the truth of God.

Yes, false prophets in the Bible are often associated with practices like divination and occultism, which are condemned by God. These practices are mentioned throughout the Bible as forms of rebellion against God's authority and truth. Here's a closer look:

Key Characteristics of False Prophets and Their Practices

1. Divination:

Divination is the attempt to gain hidden knowledge or foretell the future through supernatural means apart from God.

False prophets often relied on methods like reading omens, consulting spirits, or other pagan practices.

Deuteronomy 18:10-12:

> "Let no one be found among you... who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead. Anyone who does these things is detestable to the Lord."

2. Occult Practices:

Many false prophets engaged in occult rituals that were tied to idolatry, such as worshiping Baal or Asherah.

These practices often included sacrifices, rituals, and invoking false gods for guidance.

Ezekiel 13:6-7 describes false prophets as those who fabricate visions and lie about hearing from God:

> "Their visions are false and their divinations a lie. They say, ‘The Lord declares,’ when the Lord has not sent them; yet they expect their words to be fulfilled."

3. Misleading God’s People:

False prophets often led God’s people into sin by encouraging idolatry, immorality, and reliance on pagan practices.

Jeremiah 14:14:

> "The prophets are prophesying lies in my name. I have not sent them or appointed them or spoken to them. They are prophesying to you false visions, divinations, idolatries, and the delusions of their own minds."

4. Contrasting with True Prophets:

True prophets received their messages directly from God through divine revelation, while false prophets relied on occult methods or fabricated messages.

God’s Condemnation of Divination and Occultism

The Bible consistently warns against engaging in any form of occult practice:

Isaiah 8:19: "When someone tells you to consult mediums and spiritists, who whisper and mutter, should not a people inquire of their God?"

Micah 5:12: "I will destroy your witchcraft and you will no longer cast spells."

Conclusion

False prophets were often practitioners of divination and occultism, which were direct violations of God’s law. These practices reflected their rebellion against God and their attempts to lead others astray. God’s Word clearly distinguishes between the true prophets who spoke His truth and the false ones who relied on forbidden methods.